B
22

Update: That redditor who said my Moon shots were overprocessed was absolutely right

So about 3 weeks ago someone in this sub told me my Moon composite looked "too cooked" and that I was crushing the shadows. I got defensive at first because I spent hours on it. But I went back and compared my raw stack to the final edit and yeah, they were totally right. The detail I thought I was pulling out was just noise and sharpening artifacts. I tried reprocessing it with way less aggression and it actually looks more natural now. Has anyone else had that moment where you realized you were overdoing it?
3 comments

Log in to join the discussion

Log In
3 Comments
beth_reed
beth_reed26d ago
I read somewhere that our eyes naturally prefer less contrast in Moon photos than we think.
3
ray_miller84
ray_miller8426d agoTop Commenter
beth, that "eyes naturally prefer less contrast" thing is probably true for me because my eyes are basically potato quality at this point. I spent years squinting through chainsaw dust and now everything looks like a washed out watercolor. So if I take a Moon photo with low contrast, my brain thinks it looks just fine because that's how I see the world now. But I bet if someone with 20/20 vision looked at it they'd say it looks like a gray blob. Which is honestly how most of my photos look anyway. Maybe my eyes have been lying to me this whole time.
5
noaht15
noaht1525d ago
Wait, you're telling me people actually see more detail than what shows up in my photos? @ray_miller84 might be right that our eyes are just lying to us about what's really sharp.
1