8
Why everyone says the Appalachian Trail is better than the PCT for beginners
After bouncing between forums for months before my first big trip, I kept hearing the AT was more forgiving so I gave it a shot last June. Did about 200 miles through Virginia and the shelters were packed every night, water sources every few miles, and the trail markers were so frequent I barely needed my map. Meanwhile my buddy who hit the PCT in August said he went 14 miles without a single reliable water stop and missed a turn that added 3 hours. I get that the PCT has those big open views everyone raves about, but for a newbie like me the AT just felt way less stressful to figure out. Has anyone else found one trail way easier to navigate than the other?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
susan_wright341mo agoMost Upvoted
You said "the AT really holds your hand" and I get what you mean but I think that's exactly why it's better for beginners. The white blazes every 100 feet are great when you're still learning how to read a map and pay attention. I did the AT first and never felt lost or scared. Fallon from the PCT Facebook group said she missed a turn near the Sierra section and ended up in a snow field with no gear. That's not something a new person should have to deal with. The water reports are helpful but you still have to carry 6 liters sometimes and that's heavy for someone just starting out. For me the AT's constant ticking over the blazes just let me focus on walking and not dying.
6
kaih361mo ago
Take a look at the water reports for the PCT before you go, they're lifesavers and way more reliable than the AT's random stream crossings. The AT really holds your hand with those white blazes every 100 feet, but the PCT feels like it expects you to already know basic route finding and desert survival. Honestly, if you want to just walk and not think about planning every step, stick with the AT for your first couple trips.
3