Loading…
6
The 'we're not a bank' pitch at every Toronto fintech meetup is costing founders real deals
I was at a fintech mixer in Liberty Village last Thursday and watched four different founders give the exact same pitch to a room of investors, all leading with 'we're not a bank, we're a platform.' One guy from a payments startup spent his whole five minutes on that line and never once said what his product actually does or who pays for it. I know this matters because I sat on the other side of the table for 3 years doing partnerships at a mid-size lender here in Toronto, and I can tell you the second a founder led with that line, our legal and compliance folks would tune out. It reads as defensive, like you're pre-apologizing for something, and it tells the room nothing about your unit economics or your path to getting a single customer. The founders who actually got follow-up meetings that night were the ones who just said 'we move money for X type of business and we charge Y per transaction.' I get why people lean on the not-a-bank framing, because the regulatory stuff in Canada is genuinely confusing, but skating around it in your pitch just makes investors think you haven't figured out your own model yet. Has anyone else noticed this pattern at the Toronto or Vancouver meetups, or is it just the rooms I keep ending up in?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
adamr148d ago
Honestly this feels like a thing that sounds way worse in the retelling than it actually is. I've been to a bunch of these mixers and yeah, people say dumb stuff on stage, but that's true at every startup event in every city on earth. The idea that a single framing sentence is what killed the deal seems like a stretch when most of those pitches probably had five other problems that mattered more. Legal and compliance tuning out is also not really the flex it sounds like, those folks tune out of almost everything at a mixer. And let's be real, investors forget 90% of what they hear at these things and follow up based on who they already knew or who got introduced to them. The ones who got meetings that night likely had warm intros, not better sentences. This sounds more like a pet peeve dressed up as a market insight.
6
willowh208d ago
Ah yes, the classic "one bad sentence kills the whole deal" theory, right up there with "we lost the account because our logo was the wrong shade of blue." Been to enough of these mixers to know the real reason half those founders got no follow up is that they were boring, unprepared, or both. The framing thing might be a cute scapegoat but the guy who nailed his intro still probably went home with nothing but a lanyard and a warm sparkling water. At some point you gotta admit the room was never really about pitches in the first place.
1